We explain what autonomy is, what is moral autonomy and autonomy of will. Also, its differences with heteronomy.
What is autonomy?
Autonomy is understood to be the ability to decide independently, independently, without the coercion or influence of third parties. This term is applied within philosophical thought (ethics), psychological (evolutionary psychology) and even legal and political (sovereignty), but always with similar meanings, linked to the capacity for self-management and independence, if not freedom.
At cognitive development and emotional persons, autonomy becomes an increasingly marked and expected quality of the individual. Perhaps because as children (and still teenagers) we are vulnerable beings, who largely depend on the decisions of their parents (which in legal matters enshrines thecustody) both for the logistical and the affective. This last form of dependency is the last to disappear, as we become more autonomous and begin to make our own decisions.
Thus, adult individuals have a capacity for autonomy that makes them subjects of law, that is, people capable of making their own decisions without first consulting anyone (although they may choose to do so). In this sense it is the opposite ofheteronomy or dependency. Of course, with autonomy, as with Liberty, obligations and responsibilities are also acquired. In that sense it is a trait of maturity or adulthood.
In political matters, similarly, it is a trait of sovereignty of the nations as such: a country that has autonomy in legal, economic and cultural matters will be an independent country, therefore a country that is freer and more capable of dealing with the community international.
Moral autonomy
In autonomy converge, from a philosophical point of view, both the individual's vision before others, as well as before himself. Something linked to the psychoanalytic notion of the superego or superego: the set of rules to which the individual decides to adhere more or less consciously. This is particularly true in moral matters, in which the individual responds to a tradition culture that he has received from his parents and his environment.
Moral autonomy, therefore, will be the ability to morally judge an action, a situation or an event, thus determining whether it is something acceptable or not. Morality is susceptible to peer pressure, of course, but to the extent that individuals have well-formed criteria and are aware of their ability to decision making, a strong moral autonomy would be expected from them. Which does not mean, of course, that you cannot change your mind.
Autonomy of the will
The autonomy of the will is a basic and primordial principle of contract law and of relationships between individuals: the express, manifest desire, without any presence of coercion or obligation, to decide for the person or for their own assets, and to sign the contracts that are desired, or to negotiate their contents and effects.
Its foundation comes from laws Liberals born of the French Revolution , which raised freedom and equality among Humans, under certain limits imposed by mutual consideration. These limitations are usually:
- The signed terms of a contract cannot be signed, under penalty of breaking or rendering the document null and void.
- No clause of the contract may contradict the legal system or the jurisprudence of the Rule of law.
Autonomy and heteronomy
Heteronomy is the opposite of autonomy: the need for the precepts and determinations of an individual, society or organization come from another. Seen this way, it is a form of dependence, if not submission, since the criteria of another are those that are valid, in the absence (or instead of) their own.
Furthermore, these criteria are assumed without reflection, as is the case with values that are instilled in us when we are children: they come from outside, from our parents, and only to the extent that we become autonomous can we choose to embrace them or replace them with a code of our own.